this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
97 points (91.5% liked)

World News

39023 readers
2564 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

The action of attacking random ships in international waters?

This is piracy, and it puts huge numbers of civilian lives at direct risk and increases the chance someone else will also do it in future.

The entire international community has a duty to stop this by almost any means.

Their reasons for attacking civilian shipping in international waters could not be less important to the situation.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The action of blocking humanitarian aid to millions of starving civilians in Gaza

The action of blocking medicine to hospitals in Gaza which means that little girls are having their legs sawed off without anesthetics for amputation.

The action of those little Palestinian girls having their heads shot off by an israeli tank while lying in the hospital after having their legs amputated

Those do not "put huge numbers of civilian lives at direct risk"?

But the Houthis making it so that undetectable chess-tournament cheating equipment from Alibaba arrives a month later is what actually crosses the line of "putting civilians at risk".

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

A blockade without willingness to fire (even on civilian vessels) is toothless and therefore ineffective. I'm not sure if I'd call what they're doing a blockade tho, and their justifications linking attacked ships to Israel are... strenuous at times

[–] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's not a blockade as they're no where near Israel. They don't have the ability to enforce a blockade of Israel, just to attack random ships

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

This is false. The first ship they hijacked was claimed to not be israeli related but turned out to be owned by israeli businessman Rami Ungar

The second ship with bio gas supposedly only went to Italy, but later came out that after the stop in Italy it had a transport to israel planned.

I'm not going to to claim that every single ship was israeli. I have not looked into other vessel attacks since then. But at least the first big two that reached to news were in fact directly linked to israel despite initial claims that they weren't.

[–] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Actually came across it, here's the supposed real reason:

Ambrey assessed that the vessel was mistakenly targeted based on outdated publicly available information linking the vessel to the United Kingdom.

"This appeared to be five months old but was still listed as UK-affiliated on a public maritime database," the report said.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Maybe they're not only supporting Palestinians against israeli oppression but also the Ukranians against Russian Oppression. The unbeatable moral highground.

~~In all seriousness, no idea. If I were to guess they have a green list and someone forgot to put them on.~~ See my newer comment

[–] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If its indistinguishable from random attacks to the victims and anyone else at sea the (internationally coordinated) response should be one appropriate to random attacks on sea vessels

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

Right after the international response appropriate to israel committing genocide of course. That obviously has far more priority for us western nations that care so much about human rights.