Greentext

4379 readers

1759 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works

1433

Anon notices what they've taken from us (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 10 months ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works

496 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

which would be why i would argue to just min max on the one camera. Overall a better camera, maybe not as versatile, but meh.

[–] spader312@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I think it's a size constraint. Bigger sensors also require larger lenses. In regular DSLR world a micro four thirds sensor, the sensor size is half the size of a traditional full frame sensor. The lenses are also half the size of a fullframe camera's lenses and require far less glass and weight.

We can fit 3 smaller sensors with three smaller lenses in a smartphone. Trying to make any of those sensors bigger will require more space than a phone can provide.

Because we have to have smaller sensors, digital zoom reduces fidelity of images. Having multiple lenses optimized for various focal points mitigated this issue

I'm no expert just a hobbyist take my word with a grain of salt lol