this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
42 points (68.1% liked)

Technology

59106 readers
4410 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 months ago (6 children)

What's the specific energy and power? If it isn't terrible, could be very good for things like spacecraft.

[–] MilderRichter@feddit.de 20 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Deep space probes are already nuclear power sources.

Right now this is mostly a radio isotope heat source and a peltier device to convert the temperature differential to electricity.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, RTDs. But I don't know if these semi conductor based ones would have better performance.

[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago

Not for space craft if what @MilderRichter says is right. To generate power from a peltier you need a temperature differential between the two sides. It is very hard to bleed off heat in space since it's a vacuum. That means a temperature differential is very difficult to achieve and it takes power to do that. Which would necessitate more of these, which means a bigger or additional heat removal system, which means you need more of these, which means a bigger or additional heat removal system, etc, etc, etc.

load more comments (4 replies)