this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
23 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

8536 readers
811 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Kind of?

2042 wasn’t supposed to be the most realistic, it was the return to series roots and Magnum Opus of the studio. At this point I don’t know why even make more when nothing they do can top it

[–] Happybara@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It was not a return to the series roots in any way, and if that is their magnum opus, then the studio is doomed.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

It’s how it was advertised