this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
977 points (95.4% liked)

Political Memes

5612 readers
1970 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Your historical Jesus seems to be a very upstanding individual. Where can I go to find out more about him? The Jesus that I know about split up families and perpetrated lies about an imaginary afterlife to recruit people to continue his fantasy that has been a detriment to the growth of society.

[–] vaquedoso@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

As far as I'm aware Jesus didn't split up any families. There are plenty of papers that study the concept of Jesus and what he would have looked like, but if you are interested in just a simple overview you can just simply read the evangelions. I'm not able to recommend a particular translation, and I know the one used in english is a bit fishy, but it will be enough to get a rough understanding. But in any case, I'm not talking about Jesus as a religious leader, I'm discussing the character and the impact it had in cultures at the time, the same way one might talk about Homer, who most likely didn't exist either. But if you want to get into theology, Jesus himself was against the structure and corruption present in the church at the time, and would likely be against the institutionalization of the modern day catholic church as well. So he would definitely repude a lot of the attitudes of the north American evangelical church if that's what you mean

[–] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Luke 14:26 "If you come to me but will not leave your family, you cannot be my follower. You must love me more than your father, mother, wife, children, brothers, and sisters—even more than your own life!"

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

And James was supposedly his brother.

Mark: ignore the James community, Paul is where it is at.

Matthew: ok Paul is still where it is at, but you know James was pretty cool as well. Please Jews that the Romans didn't kill, like all five of you, come join us.

Luke: you know what? Paul and James are basically equals.

John: James is amazing but have you heard of my man the beloved disciple?

Early Church: the beloved disciple is fine, but I am on Team Mary

2nd Century Church: Mary? Sure she was there, but the Holy Ghost was the one doing the job.

It is like Kanye West microphone stealing.

Luke was copying Matthew in that passage and the important thing for Matthew was to salvage the damage Mark had done to the reputation of the James community. So he makes Jesus disdain the family. Meaning James gets the job based on merit/faith not based on nepotism.

Even if there was a historical Jesus he is very unlikely to have said anything like that. No one is that much of a narcissist and even if they were it wouldn't work among the strong tribe-family loyalty of that time and place.

Once you get that the entire NT is propaganda it makes sense.