this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
1181 points (98.5% liked)

Memes

45643 readers
1260 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't know why I even bother opening the settings app

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] words_number@programming.dev 79 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Seriously, the speed in which windows is getting worse since after win 7 is almost comical.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Win 7 was peak. Bonus points for giving option to make it look like Win9x by disabling all eye candy options.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Windows had 3 peaks. 95, xp, and 7.

Now I just use Linux. I know not everyone can, but for everything I do or need to do it all works just fine there so I couldn't be happier.

[–] uncertainty@lemmy.nz 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

My favourite Windows is still 2000.

[–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Isn't that the one you could get to BSOD with a single ping?

[–] uncertainty@lemmy.nz 3 points 10 months ago

Do you mean the ping of death? That was pretty cross-platform and a bit earlier https://insecure.org/sploits/ping-o-death.html

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

No, the last version of my that was vulnerable was 3.5.1 2000 was better than xp for a year after XP came out. You couldn't even boot XP on a driver bigger than 128GB where 2000 had that bug already patched.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Everyone can, really. It's not 2002 anymore. Linux has been ready for prime time for some time now. All it lacks is critical mass.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I mean people with tight corporate requirements cannot. Certain headaches with security designations, not all software works great in Linux, even though most do.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 10 months ago

My point is there's no required savvyness like it used to a couple decades ago.

A corporation is arguably best positioned to make the transition. The one I work at has all their administrative systems as cloud apps. The few production systems that run native can be run in a Citrix or RDP environment. Even now, with user stations running Windows, these systems are accessed through RDP for... reasons anyway.

[–] _dev_null@lemmy.zxcvn.xyz 4 points 10 months ago

Windows ME is life, only second to Windows Vista.

[–] words_number@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yes, XP was pretty great too! Can't say much about 95, we switched from DOS directly to 98 back then, which crashed all the time. I heard good things about 98SE though.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago

My memory is 98 was more stable than 95 but I was also quite young at the time so I wouldn't trust my memory that far back

[–] cophater69@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Don't forget to combine the powers of windows CE windows ME and windows NT~!

[–] vox@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

i think first release on win10 was the best, it got worse with updates

[–] words_number@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Absolutely not. First win10 release already tried to force me into using a microsoft account, had adware and trial crap preinstalled, the terrible settings windows situation, borderline unusable start menu search function, hard to disable cortana bullshit, etc. etc.

[–] vox@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Microsoft account crap wasn't as bad as it is in the most recent releases.
also win10 is the first version to introduce some significant changes that make windows so much less annoying to use and more unixy
i hate legacy windows stuff so fucking much but it's kinda a miracle how they made it work out with windows 10

[–] kidney_bean@lemmy.ml 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think after Windows 7 they tried to get into the mobile market for a while so they changed a few things to make Windows work with touch input. But then they realized that they were not up to the task of dealing with actual competition because it requires actually making a good product, so they retreated to their desktop comfort zone where they've had a monopoly since forever due to exclusive software and user habits and started to cash in on it by plastering everything with ads. Meanwhile, they pulled out the few skilled developers to have them work on cloud stuff with Azure, because at least after they accidentally lost the emails of the european parliament to a chinese intelligence service without any consequences they know that nothing threatens their dominance over the market

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yep the timeframe of Windows 8 was in the ballpark of the iPad coming on the market and being a hit. MS wanted a share of that tablet market so they made Windows 8 a piece of shit abomination combining a tablet UI and desktop UI.

They realized that was a bad idea and kept polishing their turds until they got Windows 10. Windows 9 was only released in alternate dimensions.

[–] nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 10 months ago

I still have a tablet that came with windows 8. That thing was terrible from day 0 and got unusable after a few updates. Fortunately, it's running android x86 for a few years like a charm.