this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
20 points (85.7% liked)

Australia

3613 readers
112 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nath@aussie.zone 8 points 10 months ago (4 children)

It’ll be back next year when they fuck around and find out this year.

Ultimately, Coles and Woolies are untouchable. It's almost impossible to boycott them. That's the whole problem with the grocery duopoly in Australia. I don't foresee this move having any impact on them either way. They know it, too. You may be right and they're pandering somewhat, but I am a cynic and I believe they're doing it because the range isn't making enough money to justify its shelf space.

[–] Lintson@aussie.zone 2 points 10 months ago

In a large city they can be practically boycotted. Most people just can't be bothered.

[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 1 points 10 months ago

If you utilise Aldi, IGA and/or Foodworks, you can get most of what you can get from Coles/Woolworths, and you will probably save money.

Although making trips to multiple different supermarkets is an inconvenience.

[–] trustnoone@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 10 months ago

Fwiw I think you're both right, the duality means they don't give a fuck if there is a blowback as you'll be right back there anyway and they're likely doing this because they figure the pandering may be worth the more money.

Wouldn't be surprised if the whole thing is just to stop people asking "why the fuck aren't they passing on cost savings".

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone -1 points 10 months ago

They're absolutely pandering, which is why they put this in their statement:

At the same time there’s been broader discussion about 26 January and what it means to different parts of the community