this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
173 points (97.3% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

2100 readers
93 users here now

A community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.

Rules:

  1. Be civil.
  2. Please do not link to pirated content.
  3. No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
  4. Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Fuck David Zaslav

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ryan213@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Um... So I guess I shouldn't finish season 2 then?! It's not a cliffhanger, is it? Unlike Santa Clarita Diet.

[–] TwiddleTwaddle@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's not a cliffhanger at all. The show would be greatly improved by a third season imo just because the tone of the 2nd season is really intense compared to the first, and while S2 has a fairly satisfying ending - it could really use the catharsis of a final act.

[–] TwiddleTwaddle@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Just to expand on myself, I've read that S2 had a lower budget than S1 and everybody knew they might not get a S3, so they wrote it to have a satisfying ending even though they were still hoping for S3.

[–] Malgas@beehaw.org 4 points 10 months ago

It's not a cliffhanger. I say go ahead and finish it.

[–] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Season 2’s ending actually works really well as a series finale.

[–] andthenthreemore@startrek.website 1 points 10 months ago

No, it felt like it was written primarily as an ending.