this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
516 points (96.6% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3377 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Rank-and-file members of both the House and Senate are paid $174,000 a year.

That probably seems like a decent amount of money, and it is: The median household income in 2022 was $74,580, according to the US Census.

But consider that members of Congress generally have to maintain two residences — one in Washington, DC, and one in their home state — and that they haven't gotten a raise since 2009.

Inflation, meanwhile, has eaten away at the value of that salary over time: If lawmakers' salaries had kept pace with inflation, they would be paid over $250,000 today.

Rep. Patrick McHenry, a North Carolina Republican who served as the interim speaker of the House following Kevin McCarthy's ouster, told The Dispatch that congressional pay needed to be raised in order to attract "credible people to run for office."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Whoresradish@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Maybe congresses salary should be a multiple of minimum wage so they always get increased together.

[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Try EQUAL to the minimum wage

[–] Anti_Face_Weapon@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

They need a house in DC and at home. Logically it should be double the minimum wage.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The house in DC should be provided to them as part of being in congress.

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Fuck that make them stay in "affordable housing"

[–] Lyrl@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

Apparently a number of them live in their DC offices and shower at the Congressional gym.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Id like the people establishing the laws for the country to be paid better than a fry cook.

[–] Anti_Face_Weapon@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Yeah, twice as well. Duh

[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah and if their wage was attached to the minimum wage, whatcha think if gonna happen to that minimum wage?

[–] meliaesc@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Then only the independently wealthy would run. No matter if they scale it up or not.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

their housing and food in DC should be paid for imo, those are truly extra costs. The problem here is republican strategy has long been to defund congress and their offices to make them more reliant on donors.

[–] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago

I seriously doubt it unless they can make money otherwise.