this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
134 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

37720 readers
359 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MudMan@kbin.social 29 points 10 months ago (30 children)

Where is this mystical European place where people charge for toilets? I swear, I hear this all the time when it comes to US vs EU differences and I don't know what they mean.

I mean, I know places that have toilets just for customers, so you need to ask for a key or a code to use it when you're there, I know of a couple of cities that charge a nominal fee, like a quarter for outdoor latrines for some reason, and I know of one specific train station that licensed toilets out to a private company and they tried to charge for them, which is very shitty and everybody hated it.

The idea of restaurants charging extra to pee is not a thing in the European places where I've been/lived.

[–] Sina@beehaw.org 4 points 10 months ago (13 children)

Where is this mystical European place where people charge for toilets?

Some malls have actually clean toilets, those..

[–] MudMan@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago (12 children)

I've never been charged for a mall toilet in Europe. But hey, that's the problem with saying "Europe". I can tick off maybe a copule dozen malls in maybe three or four countries, so we only have like twenty or thirty countries left to verify, assuming the practice is set at the national level and not regional.

In my mind this was a German thing that people kept saying was a European thing, but I haven't peed in enough public places in Germany to tell you.

[–] sik0fewl@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure I've seen them in the UK. I can't recall where else.

[–] MudMan@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I've been in the UK dozens of times and never seen those. I guess I just don't pee out that often, but in the pubs and restaurants I've been to it's never come up.

[–] frog@beehaw.org 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I'm in the UK, and where I live, it's almost exclusively local council owned toilets that charge a fee. So these aren't toilets inside private businesses, they're separate buildings located in car parks, at beaches, and so on. So the fee to use them is almost certainly a combination of preventing homeless people from squatting in them (since they're not watched over by staff) and to cover the costs of electricity, water, and sending someone over to clean them once in a while (since the majority of people using them are not residents of the area who have paid council tax). The fee is nominal, £0.20, and most of them now have card readers so people don't need to have a 20p coin on them.

[–] MudMan@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Right. That tracks with my experience. So when Americans are all weirded out by "paid toilets" in Europe, do they mean those? I always read that as them finding they had to pay for toilets in businesses or restaurants.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I’m Australian and we’re also weirded out by paid toilets.

Any of them is what we think of, but it’s even worse when it’s a public toilet. At least a private business being shitty is their natural state.

[–] frog@beehaw.org 3 points 10 months ago

In an ideal world, yes, the council-owned toilets would be free to use (and there'd be some mechanism for taxing tourism so the people that are using the beach and car park toilets are the ones paying for them). But I really do think Americans and Australians are overstating how common this is, because it really is a minority of toilets - I only actually know of two in my area, compared to dozens of other toilets that are completely free to use.

[–] frog@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago

Yep, I'm assuming that's what Americans get weirded out by. Which is just weird because it's definitely a minority of toilets anyway. The vast majority of toilets in cafes, restaurants, bars, and large shops (or indeed any business where it's normal to be there for more than 10-15 minutes) are either publically accessible and free to use, or can be accessed with permission. It's generally frowned upon to walk into a business, use the toilet, and not buy something though, and even cafes and restaurants will only let you use the toilets if you buy at least one drink, so it could be that Americans are running into that.

There's also a thing that only some businesses have toilets positioned in a place where customers can access them - obviously if it's a tiny shop and the only toilet they have can only be reached by going through the stock room, they're not going to let people just wander in and out (and may also be barred by their insurance policy from letting non-staff into the back rooms.) They might bend that rule for someone they know, but not for someone they don't - in my home town, I know several businesses that would let me use their toilets in a pinch, but they wouldn't let a complete stranger do so (they trust me not to nick stuff, or know where to find me if I do!) So there's definitely a bunch of social conventions about when and where you can use a business's toilets, which I can easily see Americans tripping over. As I understand it, the approach to customer service is quite different in the US compared to here.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)