this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
160 points (67.9% liked)

Memes

45546 readers
1124 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] BCsven@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Nope, first was UK with London Underground in 1863 (has 250 miles of track now) and 5th was USA is 1897.

https://www.oldest.org/geography/subway-systems/

[โ€“] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Hi friend, please reread and note the caveat, "one of the very first", which position number 5 certainly includes.

Also, a bit childish to want to rank systems based on creation date. If you feel like "losing", please read on:

  • NYC total system length is about 800 miles (1.1km)
  • yearly ridership: 1.8bn rides
  • If we count the el's (elevated rapid transit, which is still running), first ride was in iirc 1868.

But look, the important thing is that both our countries (presuming you live in the UK) have nice mass transit systems to keep cars off the roads. I look forward to visiting your country and riding its underground system at some point.

[โ€“] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

When somebody says one of the first it implies by time (and US was 30 years later. ) Thus why that link I posted rates them by creation date. If you had claimed by best subway by milage I would link to which one ranks them by order of mileage. If I feel like losing. LOL It isn't a zero sum game we are playing, Just facts I linked. Sorry you feel so offended. Hope you have a good new year.

[โ€“] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Most people wouldn't respond to the question, "who was here first?" with "how much time has passed since you got here?". Right?

[โ€“] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, by saying first it would mislead people into thinking USA were pioneers, but they were actually fifth because it took USA longer to institute. Not judging, just saying...and it makes sense because UK has been a country with cities for thousands of years, while USA is relatively new...with a slower need to get people moved

[โ€“] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I understand what you're saying, and I don't agree. We'll just leave it there ๐Ÿ˜Ž

[โ€“] qjkxbmwvz@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Parent said "one of," not "the very first." Wikipedia has US with 4 out of the first 10 metro stations https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_metro_systems

Interesting to note is that some (all?) of those early metro systems are arguably more successful than the subsequent US systems.

[โ€“] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

The dates on that list skip over the countries from other web links of same data. maybe somebody forgot to add the others to this data