this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2024
23 points (73.5% liked)

Programming

17433 readers
236 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
snowe@programming.dev
Ategon@programming.dev
MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz
23
Git Things (matklad.github.io)
submitted 10 months ago by schalkneethling@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Kache@lemm.ee 22 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

A title as uninformative as the single . commit messages he suggests writing.

Bare minimums of typo, refactor, whitespace, comments are barely any effort -- less than the thought it takes to name variables and functions.

I really can't agree with completely meaningless messages like minor and .

[โ€“] technom@programming.dev 5 points 10 months ago

Git is a lot of things at once:

  1. A tool to record development history - warts and all
  2. A tool to create a logical sequence of changes
  3. A tool to communicate intent and ideas to a maintainer

Meaningless messages like minor and . don't suit any of these roles - not even 1. Even when recording development history with all mistakes, you'd still need context when you look back at the history. Matklad is a well respected developer. I wonder why he's make such a bizarre claim.