this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
452 points (99.3% liked)

politics

18894 readers
3520 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Carvex@lemmy.world 146 points 8 months ago (5 children)

How in 2024 do we not have the ability to find and prosecute offenders of false 911 calls like this?

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 116 points 8 months ago (2 children)

We do but our cops are fascist and want Trump to win.

[–] vexikron@lemmy.zip 19 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Ding Ding Ding!

I managed to quite royally piss off a paranoid county contracted bounty huntress by showing her Trump's mugshot.

Good thing she needed me as a witness.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 51 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Why would cops investigate themselves?

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago (2 children)

If the caller has more than two braincells, they'll user a burner phone, rented phone number etc.

These types of things are next to impossible to trace if done right

[–] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 47 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but if GOP voters were smart they wouldn't be voting for the GOP, so should be pretty easy to trace.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Criminal minds don't necessarily have to be smart, they have to be criminal.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Nah, they get caught all the time. There is just an endless supply of brain-dead conservative cultist to keep doing it.

Remember Cesar Sayoc?

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Yep, that's why I included the two brain cell clause, covers a good 50% of the population, perhaps even more than that

[–] xor@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago

people who do that are found frequently... but if they're not completely dumb, they would be untraceable. (basically a burner phone)

i remember one guy, who eventually got caught anyways, had a swatting service where he used some aol service that would transcribe phone calls for the blind, and contacted them over tor...
i think it should be hard for cops to track people... it should be possible to defy the gov

e.g. if drumpf becomes dictator, it'll be good to have a way to escape...

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Police are only obliged to protect private property. Especially large collections of private property. Not people.

[–] Redward@yiffit.net 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That’s why it’s the role of the fbi to investigate any threats to officials

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world -4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I really appreciate all the people responding with valid well thought out counter points and examples. Not simply smashing the download button because they can't prove otherwise but still don't like it.

  • Edit I really appreciate all the people responding with valid well thought out counter points and examples. Not simply smashing the down vote button because they can't prove otherwise but still don't like it.