Linux
Welcome to c/linux!
Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!
Rules:
-
Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.
-
Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.
-
Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.
-
No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.
-
No NSFW adult content
-
Follow general lemmy guidelines.
view the rest of the comments
I don't have a ton of snaps installed but haven't noticed any degradation in speed so far for something like Firefox.
Also I don't think Ubuntu shipped with flatpak before snaps. Some of the other flavors of Ubuntu did but chose to go with snaps instead. You can always install flatpak if you want.
Not that anyone has to be okay with snaps or the direction Canonical is going. I've been eyeballing LMDE myself!
I should've been clearer - the speed issues were to do with installation (and updating) rather than running speed. The whole process seemed very slow and hung quite often. But, as I just said to @Varyk, maybe that was a misconfiguration on my part.
I'm definitely not an Ubuntu hater at all, its just the culmination of a few things like the Snaps coupled with Canonical's slightly weird attitude was enough to make me want to switch.
As for LMDE, I definitely recommend it. It's solid as a rock and once I put Gnome on it, was exactly how I wanted it.