this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
858 points (90.6% liked)

Political Memes

5444 readers
3576 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Neither Hamas nor the IDF have a moral high ground here. They both need to stop killing civilians.

The one thing both have in common is refusal to take peace talks seriously. Hamas refuses to let go of their hostages, and Israel continues their bombing campaign against Hamas.

Its a difficult situation because these are the "adults" in the room. The civilians involved have little power at all.

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Hamas did let some hostages go fwiw.

Both Hamas and the Israeli government do not want peace, though. They're on the same side in that. (Hence Israel sending cash and stuff to keep Hamas in power.)

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Israel sending cash…to keep Hamas in power

Oh no…

NYT article (no paywall)

That’s… bad.

Vetted one of the Times’ claims too: the Israeli press decrying the Qatari payments in 2014.

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago

It's pretty fucking bad.

The Israeli government directly aided the terrorist attack that killed over 1000 people. They're not protecting their citizens. Leveling Gaza doesn't protect shit. They're not changing their policies. They are a disaster both for the Israeli and Palestinian people.

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago

Meanwhile Israel has bombed known locations of hostages AND shot a few of them.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Hell, if anything, hamas is more interested in releasing the hostages than Israel is. They've let a few go, meanwhile the idf says "never forget" while turning Gaza into a crater. They don't give a flying fuck about the hostages.

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Hell, if anything, hamas is more interested in releasing the hostages than Israel is.

What the fuck? Hamas fucking took those hostages to begin with and started this mess.

There's a comprehensive peace plan proposed by Egypt and Qatar. When Hamas steps up to the table and accepts the peace deal, then maybe you'd have grounds to stand on. But for now, Hamas refuses to give up the hostages, and continues to fight.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (39 children)

They took hostages for a reason, ostensibly to exchange them for something. Hamas doesn't want peace though, so why would they care about a peace plan? Also, as mentioned before, they have released a few already.

load more comments (39 replies)
[–] SCB@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Israel tried peace talks for over 60 years. When one side's non-negotiable is "you all have a to die" it's hard to secure lasting peace.

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

People don't seem to understand that the Genocide / Nazi argument plays against Hamas, lol.

But yeah, it's a tough situation. I'd argue that Bibi's government was pretty shit at pursuing peace though.

But that's outside the scope of the conflict today. Almost everything has to do with Oct 7th. The good news is that Egypt and Qatar want a peace to work, and as Muslim countries they're going to be Muslim-favored / more likely to have a lasting effect in the region (rather than say, a US brokered peace deal).

So a path to peace ... Or at least a ceasefire in this current flareup in hostilities... still exists. There is reason for hope.

[–] DeadHorseX@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But yeah, it's a tough situation. I'd argue that Bibi's government was pretty shit at pursuing peace though.

Totally. He's massively implicated in propping up Hamas and undermining support for the non-militant Palestinian Authority in the West Bank. This is well-known in Israel at this point, and one reason for the coming reckoning he's going to face at the ballot box.

[–] Meowoem@sh.itjust.works -3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This is not accepted fact anywhere but conspiracy land, there are articles saying that Israel have been far too soft on Hamas by letting aid through, limiting the effectiveness of bombing missions to limit civilian casualties, and ending prior conflicts before totally destroying them. These are all things which the international community loudly calls for, you can't be pro Palestine and say that Israel is responsible for Hamas because they have ceasefires and allow aid deliveries - you're using hardline arguments to call for a soft line, it doesn't make sense