this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023
154 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37666 readers
302 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 26 points 9 months ago (9 children)

From the Apple claims:

Masimo waited over a decade after it filed its original provisional applications, only to file the new applications that became the supposedly infringed patents just a week after Apple launched the first of the accused Apple Watch products.

Sounds to me like that should be illegal, no matter who does it.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 14 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Well if it was their IP, and they had it in a product, it's theirs. They registered it over 10 years ago. Did Apple just magically come up with the same idea, or did they see and copy it?

A patent troll usually sits on patents they don't use. This is a legitimate company with products. A small guy that cannot afford to file paperwork for all their stuff immediately shouldn't be penalised.

One thing that is weird is that apple always has a lot of people ready to defend the big multi-billion dollar corp.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

They registered it over 10 years ago. [...] or did they see and copy it?

You can see patents once they get published, not when the provisional claim gets filed... so no, Apple could not see and copy it.

Apple just magically come up with the same idea

According to Masimo, Apple lured some engineers from Masimo to develop a solution... that happened to be similar enough that Masimo could file, and this time publish a patent after the fact that made Apple infringe it.

a lot of people ready to defend the big multi-billion dollar corp.

Even more people look at the finger and miss the Moon of a broken patent aystem.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

That's even worse. When they're hiring multiple devs from there, they cannot claim they didn't know it existed. Also, if the product actually exists, they don't need to see a patent filing to copy it...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)