this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
541 points (96.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

19512 readers
378 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Feyter@programming.dev
anzo@programming.dev
BurningTurtle@programming.dev
pylapp@programming.dev
541
no.. just no (lemmy.ca)
submitted 10 months ago by reimufumo@lemmy.ca to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
93 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cmdrkeen@programming.dev 83 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Honestly not the worst thing I’ve seen.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 14 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I'd like you to think for a moment about CTEs, the HAVING clause, window functions and every other funky and useful thing you can do in SQL ... Now just think, do you think that this syntax supports all those correctly?

[–] Primarily0617@kbin.social 33 points 10 months ago

sql syntax doesn't support even itself correctly i fail to see your point

[–] cmdrkeen@programming.dev 16 points 10 months ago

Probably no better or worse than any other ORM written in a more traditional language. Worst comes to worst, you can always escape to plain SQL.