this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
584 points (98.5% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54609 readers
530 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bighatchester@lemmy.world 137 points 10 months ago (3 children)

It's just cable tv all over again. Pay for 8 services to get a handful of shows you want to watch with the other 90% not being touched , now with ads creeping back in too .

[–] Gloria@sh.itjust.works 38 points 10 months ago (2 children)

And yet, people will fall for it again and again

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 30 points 10 months ago (1 children)

People that don't pirate won't have a choice.

[–] Yglorba@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

While I'm all for piracy (obviously), there's always a choice. Decades ago when cable was going through this, TV was at the center of culture and absolutely everyone watched it.

That's just not true anymore. Even aside from piracy, they have to compete for people's time and attention with videogames, social media, and all sorts of other internet-based entertainment. I suspect a lot of the executives making these decisions don't realize this - they think it's still 20 years ago when having some of your biggest shows on your channel guaranteed a big audience. If they squeeze too hard people will just spend their time with other sorts of entertainment.

I think that the publishing industry is a good comparison - look at where it is now. It still produces stuff but its cultural relevance is a pale shadow of what it once was and its margins are razor-thin because few people are going to pay a premium even for a bestseller. I think that that's the long-term fate of TV and movies, especially as the generation that was weened on them dies off and a new generation that watched much less growing up comes of age.

[–] ThoGot@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

publishing industry

As in book publishing?

[–] bighatchester@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Not me ! But not everyone has a PC that can store tons of movies and shows so they don't have much other choice . There's one streaming service that I think is only in Canada called crave that charges an extra $10 to watch on anything other than your phone it's just the worst .

[–] White_Flight@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

get a debrid service

[–] ByteWizard@lemm.ee -4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But not everyone has a PC

That's a decision they've made for themselves. No sympathy. Computers are cheap, storage even cheaper.

[–] dipshit@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Personal responsiblity

[–] ares35@kbin.social 32 points 10 months ago (1 children)

at least you can choose to pay for one streamer at a time, binge, switch, repeat.

(for now, anyway.. until they all quit the full season drops and/or start putting their catalog on a rotation like the 'disney vault' was to home video).

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 21 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Or only offer annual contracts with early cancellation fees.

[–] ares35@kbin.social 13 points 10 months ago

they'd go a 'no refunds' policy first, which they'd totally get away with in the u.s.

[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 10 months ago

Yeah, this is what is next. Another thing might be to split up one service into subcategories, like family, sci-fi, cinema or whatever and then charging for each individually. Obviously ending up more expensive if you get them all than what it is now.