this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
22 points (92.3% liked)

UK Nature and Environment

386 readers
44 users here now

General Instance Rules:

Community Specific Rules:

Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.

Our autumn banner is a shot of maple leaves by Hossenfeffer.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
GreyShuck@feddit.uk
Kim@feddit.uk
22
Animal rights group urges halt to ‘monstrous’ Cleethorpes salmon farm (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 10 months ago by GreyShuck@feddit.uk to c/nature@feddit.uk
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Animal rights campaigners are urging Michael Gove to stop the construction of the UK’s first fully on-land salmon farm, claiming the decision to give it planning permission was flawed.

Animal Equality says an environmental impact assessment (EIA) should have been carried out before North East Lincolnshire council (NELC) gave the green light to the salmon farm in Cleethorpes, which it says would be the world’s biggest at land or sea.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago (3 children)

There's people opposing a planned land fish farm around me. I don't get it. Floating fish farms are certainly terrible. The water coming from a land based fish farm is at least monitored, unlike say, a cattle farm which just has mountains of shit washing away uncontrolled. We have a a very large sewage lagoon for our little town that discharges into the lake. The movement and treatment of water seems like it'd be a solved problem.

What's with the immediate NIMBY against these operations? We've got to eat, we can't keep eating wild caught stuff we'll eat it all. Farming in the water poisons the local water and wild populations. What's the plan then? Soylent Green?

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

As much as I hate to agree with the weird hippies, farmed salmon contains far more contaminants like heavy metals.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

On a quick Google, that seems to depend on who wrote the article. There's plenty of people claiming that and plenty of people denying. My guess is you get more pollutants from your nonstick frying pan than the fish.

I know plenty of hunter guys who would never buy meat from a store, but store meat is monitored to a much greater degree than wild meat. I don't know where I stand, but we know what the farmed fish are eating. Whether that's good or bad I don't know. I am opposed to knee jerk NIMBYism

[–] RenownedBalloonThief@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Literally beans. The answer is more beans. Step away from the fish, and consume more beans instead.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

Legumes suck heavy metal from the dirt too...

However, several studies have shown that dangerous metals like lead, cadmium and mercury can build up in these legumes, which is deleterious for human health. Second, finding dangerous metals in legumes and figuring out how dangerous they are can help change food safety policies and rules to protect public health.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0889157523001564#:~:text=However%2C%20several%20studies%20have%20shown,rules%20to%20protect%20public%20health

[–] protist@mander.xyz 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

These are animal rights activists, they are vegans who oppose any project that involves keeping animals for food. I don't always disagree with them, but they will always be opposed to any project like this. Where some of us see grey, they only see black and white

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

Oh, right. Soylent Green it is then.