this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023
685 points (93.9% liked)

World News

38977 readers
2627 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So maybe 2,000 pound bombs weren't the right weapon?

[–] stevehobbes@lemy.lol -3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

There are no good weapons for densely populated areas. Civilian casualties will always be high in populated urban areas unfortunately.

[–] Snoozemumrik@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Especially when you've cornered that population in an open air prison before bombing them.

[–] stevehobbes@lemy.lol -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Egypt could open their gates if they wanted to.

[–] Shyfer@ttrpg.network 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So Israel can displace the whole population of Palestine? That's genocide. You're pro genocide.

[–] stevehobbes@lemy.lol -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

First, I’m not pro anything. I didn’t say anyone should do something. I said there are other parties who could do something.

Second, displacement isn’t genocide by any definition I’ve heard. And again, to be extra explicit, I’m not saying they should be displaced, or that it would be right to displace anyone.

But you can’t call it an open air prison and then call me a genocide supporter when I point out there’s another door to the “prison”?

[–] Snoozemumrik@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Oh, okay. The displacement part is just a crime against humanity according to UN definition, the rest of the genocide is covered by "Killing members of the group; Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group"

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There are better weapons though. Also, shooting people who are trying to evacuate through your lines is generally considered bad. Compressing the population into a smaller area that you're using 2,000 pound bombs in is also bad.

Nobody is expecting zero civilian causalities, but this is obviously the most inept army or a professional army conducting a genocide.

[–] stevehobbes@lemy.lol -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But if it were a professional army conducting a genocide as you allege, wouldn't they be much better at it? This is where I keep coming back to.

I would agree with "professional army that is ranking military value significantly higher than minimizing civilian casualties" but that isn't genocide.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They don't have to be doing it systematically to be doing it. And participation would still likely vary between units. It's an extremely difficult thing to do psychologically. So some units are pulling all the military age men out to shoot and others are just shooting whoever they happen to see that's not in an IDF uniform. Both are genocidal acts.

[–] stevehobbes@lemy.lol 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

OK.... so any war crime is genocide now? It really feels like we're broadening the definition substantially. And don't get me wrong - war crimes are awful and should be prosecuted. But calling them all genocide feels.... dilutive to systematic extermination of a people.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Taken alone, no. But those are just two examples, of many to choose from, to show how genocide doesn't necessarily mean trains and ovens.