Atheism

1989 readers

1 users here now

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

Nerf@lemmy.ml

spaceghoti@lemmy.one

Many prehistoric handprints show a finger missing. What if this was not accidental? (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 10 months ago by FirstCircle@lemmy.ml to c/atheism@lemmy.ml

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

scientists led by archaeologist Prof Mark Collard of Simon Fraser University in Vancouver say the truth may be far more gruesome. “There is compelling evidence that these people may have had their fingers amputated deliberately in rituals intended to elicit help from supernatural entities,” said Collard.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] LeadEyes@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Even then religious rituals is a bucket explanation used when archeologists have no idea why something is a certain way. If something is weird about an extinct animal then it's always for mate selection reasons. The same sort of thing.

[–] FirstCircle@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 months ago

Except that they (researchers) are claiming to have an idea of why something (fingers) is a certain way (chopped-off in cave paintings).

“There is compelling evidence that these people may have had their fingers amputated deliberately in rituals intended to elicit help from supernatural entities”

If you review their research and find cite-able problems with it, fine, but they're specifically asserting that they have reason to believe that these amputations were real and inspired by beliefs in supernatural deities.