People Twitter

5230 readers

772 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a tweet or similar
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

695

Accidentally ruthless (startrek.website)

submitted 11 months ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

71 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tuhriel@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And what do you do if you want to reference how fast the field moves, or why certain methods are not done anymore, but where found 'good enough' back in the days. You would still have to use the old source and cite them...

An absolute cut off doesn't teach you anything...a guidance, how to identify good sources from bad or outdated ones would be much better

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

I don't imagine a paper of that scope would have such a restriction.