this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
50 points (93.1% liked)

Aotearoa / New Zealand

1651 readers
1 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general

Rules:

FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom

 

Banner image by Bernard Spragg

Got an idea for next month's banner?

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Dave@lemmy.nz
RaoulDuke@lemmy.nz
50
New Plymouth councillor complains cycle lane separation barriers will ruin his sports car (www.rnz.co.nz)
submitted 11 months ago by Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz to c/newzealand@lemmy.nz
47 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Does this headline seem fair to you? He's a former ambulance driver, and his complaint is the new cycle lanes will prevent vehicles from moving out of the way of an ambulance. The headline presents this as him being concerned about damaging his car should he accidentally drive over one. It seems like a very clickbaity way to present the article if you ask me.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Did you not read the entire comment chain?

[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I did. And you said, and I quote:

That phrase does not appear in the article. Why are you using a quote that doesn’t exist?

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Because he used the quote symbol for something that wasn't a quote.

Quoting something I said, in a manner that completely changes what was said, and presenting it in a manner that makes it sound like it came from the article is shifty as hell.

[–] Rangelus@lemmy.nz 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You are the only one who thinks any of that. It was perfectly clear he was quoting you. And no, he didn't "completely change what was said".

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

his complaint is the new cycle lanes will prevent vehicles from moving out of the way of an ambulance. The headline presents this as him being concerned about damaging his car should he accidentally drive over one.

VS

him being concerned about damaging his car should he accidentally drive over one.

You don't see how this changes anything?

[–] Rangelus@lemmy.nz 1 points 11 months ago

Nope