this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
1013 points (96.7% liked)

Memes

45536 readers
407 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Algea is a much much better oxygenator with lower maintainence, people don't seem to notice how fast cities can kill trees.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 16 points 11 months ago (2 children)

You don't need to put algae in cities. They can be basically anywhere to absorb CO2.

Trees in cities tend to be carefully chosen for the environment. Are we in a climate where we need to put salt on the road in the winter? Choose trees that can tolerate some salt in the ground.

[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Maybe stop putting salt down in winter??? Who does that still they need to stop.

[–] brik100@midwest.social 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

As much as it sucks, until we reduce the need for cars, northern rural areas are going to need to use salt for roads to be usable. Of course, if global warming gets worse it won't be an issue

[–] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 months ago

"Global warming" doesn't mean warmer winters. It means extreme summers and winters and nothing in between, with a global temperature raising.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Besides the already stated fact that global warming will only make winters worse, there are better ways like cleaning the snow (ok, that's radical) or using abrasives like sand or gravel.

[–] eltimablo@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Clearing the snow doesn't fix the ice that snowplows leave behind and gravel/sand is a straight placebo. That's why the roads get salted/brined.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

My major metropolitan City kills New trees literally every year.

[–] evranch@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And the oceans are incredibly vast, so they provide most of the world's oxygen! Obviously it's hard to get a precise number but 50-70% is the accepted range.

There are many reasons to plant trees in the city but local oxygen supply isn't one of them. Mostly trees look nice, and make people feel better by their presence. They also have a significant cooling effect, something a steamy tank full of warm algae definitely won't help with on a summer day.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Local oxygenation is important, conversion at the source pretty much always is.

Moreover it doesn't at all imply in lue of trees and importantly oxygenate at the same rate day and night since they're independently lit ideally 24/7/365.

[–] Natanael 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

My first thought is you can embedd this inside buildings rather trivially

[–] Cato_the_Posadist@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Walls made out of these would be cool

[–] Perhapsjustsniffit@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

We keep killing the ocean then asking why we need those stupid plants.

[–] EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

even so, I bet the billionaires were ecstatic about how it doesn't give any shade on hot days