this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
98 points (86.0% liked)

linuxmemes

21197 readers
224 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    98
    Ram usage on windows compared to Linux (yewtu.be)
    submitted 11 months ago by dallo@lemmy.kiois.net to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    32 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     

    For those who couldn't read the Linux GUI:

    • Windows used 3.4 GB / 8GB
    • Linux used 800 MB/ 8 GB
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] Slotos@feddit.nl 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    RAM is the fastest and most expensive memory in your PC. It uses energy, regardless of whether you use the memory. Not utilising RAM is a waste of resources.

    There’s a reason good monitoring tools draw a stacked RAM chart.

    [–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

    Exactly. I wish we moved to a process lifecycle that has a "save your data because you're dying upon the return from this function" stage, similar to the way Android has it. That would allow us to keep a lot more processes in RAM. But it would require massive software changes given the body of software written the classical way and so it's unlikely to happen.

    [–] Samsy@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

    Ask devs how many issue reports they gather about app consumes too much ram.