Selfhosted

40174 readers

874 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

Downsides of self hosting fediverse from homelab / locally? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 11 months ago by cyclohexane@lemmy.ml to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I am wanting to self host a fediverse instance. I don't hope to make it big. Hoping for 200 users at most, and I won't advertise it heavily so it'll probably be a while before it gets there.

Is it a bad idea to host something like this on local hardware at home? I have a lot of local-only self hosted services, and I wouldn't want those to be compromised.

But my biggest fear is overloading my network. I already don't get the fastest signal in some parts of my house, and I am worried the extra traffic might put more pressure on the network.

What are your thoughts on hosting local? Should I just avoid the headache and host on public instance?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] oleorun@real.lemmy.fan 7 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I'm doing what you want to do now. I'm running lemmy.fan on a NAS with really good hardware on a fiber connection. My ISP provides symmetric bandwidth and doesn't block anything, though emails can't be sent with a local smtp server since most places don't trust the IP addresses of residential subscribers.

I learned a ton, I'm enjoying running things, and though it's an open instance I don't advertise it. I say go for it. Experiment and have fun. If it sucks and you hate it you just stop the containers.

[–] jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev 6 points 11 months ago

Though now its been advertised 🤣

[–] th3raid0r@tucson.social 2 points 11 months ago

Lucky! I wish I had symmetrical fiber with all the ports available.

I totally have a server capable of hosting a LOT of things but lack the upload to make use of it. I'm considering transferring to a rack mount and sending it to be colocated at a datacenter within driving distance.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Realistically, how much bandwidth does Lemmy need if pict-rs is disabled, if you tested that?
I am thinking of something a bit crazy if freenom shows up working again. Since my only internet connection is mobile data, I am thinking about the possibility of hosting Lemmy in Termux and using a Cloudflare tunnel. The biggest problem is probably bandwidth. It varies between 0.02-6Mbps, hanging around 1Mbps for most of the day.

But I am not sure if Lemmy could even run in Termux in the first place.
Probably a stupid idea regardless.

[–] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 2 points 11 months ago

Definitely not stupid.