this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
22 points (84.4% liked)

Science

13206 readers
7 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For decades, government scientists have toiled away trying to make nuclear fusion work. Will commercial companies sprint to the finish?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Most highly sought-after technologies 'take time', and develop in an iterative fashion called 'successive approximation'.

Heckling from the sidelines is what is known as 'being unhelpful'.

[–] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago

I am not 'heckling from the sideline' to the ppl working on it. I am just 'heckling from the sideline' the media for trying to generate clicks with such headlines.

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.one 3 points 11 months ago

It would have been achieved by now if it had more than just token amounts of funding.

[–] Perfide@reddthat.com 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You're completely missing the point. Yeah, this stuff takes time, and it will continue to take time. The point is, this article saying we're "closing in on it" is clickbait garbage that's just as useful as the one a decade ago saying we are "closing in on it", and a decade before that.

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So you're unimpressed with what's been going on at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory? Where they've induced a fusion reaction for a net energy gain? And repeated with better results?

Were we achieving net energy gain a decade ago? The decade before that?

Is net energy gain the goal? If so, does repeatable demonstration of the phenomena mean that we are closing in on it, or does it mean that we are moving further away from it?