this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
105 points (95.7% liked)

World News

38563 readers
2889 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] derf82@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Neither is ok. But only one likely violates the constitution. Congress could make legacy admissions illegal if they wanted to.

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Congress could've made affirmative action illegal if they wanted to?

But only one side works as the majority's dog whistle.

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yes. Even noted red state California (/s) voted in a referendum to make the practice illegal.

I really appreciate this take, because it reminded me that I can always call my congressman (or at least their office) and voice my opinion to ears that might be able to do something about it.