this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
100 points (100.0% liked)

Science

3220 readers
247 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] coldhotman@nrsk.no 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] Sal@mander.xyz 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That is true, the whole field is difficult to define using language.

Usually I interpret "consciousness' to mean 'qualia', but even this word is strongly debated by philosophers, so that doesn't help us much.

When talking about what is conscious and what isn't, I am usually talking about the notions of consciousness that are discussed when we look at the 'hard problem of consciousness'.

The definition of 'ability to react to the surroundings' is one that can be tested using scientific methods. When one applies a definition that is directly correlated to well-defined neural dynamics (brain activity in a specific region) or behavior (self-recognition when looking at a mirror), then those are usually referred to as the 'easy problems' of consciousness, because we can test these experimentally.

The hard problem deals with the actual subjective experience. Whether a 'movie' is being played for something or someone to experience.

[–] coldhotman@nrsk.no 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)