this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
28 points (81.8% liked)

Canada

7130 readers
268 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Regions


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah this is so wrong. I read stats claiming only the top 30% make $70k annually or more. That’s basically $4k a month take home. Given rent and bills, that actually likely leaves people with like $1,500 for food and other. Given the cost of food, I can’t see anyone eating on a budget of $200 a month. Even eating moderately costs about $400-500 and you’re likely making most of your meals from scratch.

And that’s the top 30%. What are the other 70% living like? Because I buy a dozen eggs, some milk, a loaf of bread and I’m down like $20.

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think you are looking at individual income where household is more appropriate. The median after tax household income is 68k. So that's still 50% doing worse, but it's a little better than you make out.

[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sorry how is 68k annually per household better than 70k per person? Your figures make the situations worse.

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

70k per household is the top 50% of renters not the top 30 like you say.

[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 months ago

Yes but out of a household of 4, you’d theoretically have two people earning $70k annually if per person right? So your stats half the household incomes but only drop the population by 15% give or take. Thats far more bleak.