this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
105 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30556 readers
203 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I am actually shocked that 25% of those shitcoin "games" didn't fail

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] MJBrune@beehaw.org 35 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

Facts Section:

The real question is how does that compare to the rest of the games industry and what counts as a "fail".

So according to the article: a "failure" is when a game becomes "inactive." That seems like a poor standard for failing since every game will eventually be marked as a failure no matter how successful it once was. It could bring in millions of dollars but only 56 people played Deus Ex 1 today. Is that enough to count it as "inactive"? They don't define inactive so it's hard to really say if it's absolute zero or near zero and for how long?

This also is only counting the GameFi platform and only.

So 75% of web3 mobile games fail to stay active for over 5 years. Let's see how this checks with the rest of the industry.

https://www.gamesindustry.biz/report-83-of-mobile-games-fail-in-the-three-years-after-launch

83% of mobile games fail in 3 years and 43% of them fail to make it to release.

Okay but what about profitability. That's what really matters!

https://www.shacknews.com/article/56053/analyst-only-4-of-games

4% of games are deemed profitable.

Opinion:

I wouldn't play Web3 games, I don't really see a future for web3. I also don't really see a future for VR/AR. I could be wrong about these things but they right now all seem like gimmicks that haven't caught on. I also think that LLM AI isn't as mind blowingly useful as everyone might think. I think it's a neat tool and nothing more. It's not going to revolutionize AI. That will come from other advancements, potentially on top of LLM but more likely in parallel.

That all said, these stats don't seem to mark the death of web3. These stats actually seem slightly better than the rest of the industry. It's likely because they are on a rise with VC and other funding.

[โ€“] gk99@beehaw.org 4 points 11 months ago

I wouldn't play Web3 games, I don't really see a future for web3

There's no future for these because the big players that could pull it off have no reason to do so. Game publishers love FOMO and thus hate trading, and platform owners would probably look at Valve's success with the Steam Marketplace instead of the continued failure of crypto.

I also don't really see a future for VR/AR.

This one doesn't have that same sort of constraint where it fundamentally doesn't make sense.

VR has a future as an entertainment system for sure. Probably not as widespread as simply grabbing a PS5 and playing Madden, but there's a ton of potential especially as older hardware drops in price and game libraries continue to expand. Porn is gonna keep this concept alive forever either way.

As for AR, its future is utility. Seeing map directions on the road itself, interactive models during meetings, having real life Shadowplay built into your glasses since they're camera peripherals, etc. Or porn but in your room with your own parts idk.

load more comments (3 replies)