this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
116 points (97.5% liked)

World News

39046 readers
3702 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] huginn@feddit.it 20 points 11 months ago (2 children)

That's often the case with war

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I think it was the U.S. Civil War where disease killed more soldiers than battles.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Infection. This was a time where modern medicine didn’t exist. There were no antibiotics.

Amputations and basic injuries often times lead to death due to infection.

In a war torn country getting access to basic medical supplies will essentially lead to the same thing.

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

One of the elements of the American Civil War that people don't know is, yes, early in the war disease was a big killer, but by the end of the war in the North the American Red Cross was established and soldiers were able to recover from battlefield wounds in safe and sterile hospitals.

A great example is Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain recovery from a gruesome bullet wound at Petersburg. He was hit in the right hip and torn through his Lower body and out the left hip. The division doctor actually recorded him dead, but he was promoted to Brigadier General by Grant as a result. He was evacuated to first a field hospital than five months of recovery at a hospital. He returned to Command before the end of the war and was the General who actually accepted Lee's surrender of his army at Appomattox. He was in charge of the collection of arms and ordered his troops to salute their defeated foe in an act of chivalry.

So while early in the war medical care was terrible, there was a revolution in battlefield medicine by the end of the war.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Also WWI, thanks to the Spanish Flu.