People Twitter

5210 readers

2210 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a tweet or similar
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

1035

If it wasn't in an encyclopedia, you just trusted word of mouth. (startrek.website)

submitted 11 months ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

91 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

It is certainly more complex than a predictive text machine. It does seem to understand the concept of objective truth, and facts, vs interpretation and inaccurate information. It never intentionally provides false information, but sometimes it thinks it is giving factual information when really it is using an abundance of inaccurate information that it was trained with. I'm honestly surprised at how accurate it usually is, considering it was trained with public data from places like Reddit, where common inaccuracies have reached the level of folklore.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

It is certainly more complex than a predictive text machine

No, it literally isn't. That's literally all it is.

It does seem to understand

Because people are easily fooled, but what it seems like isn't what's actually happening.

but sometimes it thinks it is giving factual information

It's incapable of thinking. All it does is generate a plausible sequence of words.