this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
260 points (98.9% liked)

World News

39046 readers
3834 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But this isn't clear cut; I tend to hear that smokers are a net plus for a country's finances because of the taxes on cigarettes and due to dying younger, before costlier chronic disease treatments and social care are required.

So yes, you should be asking where to draw the line.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

A lot of the reasoning for banning smoking is second hand smoke. So far we’re drawing the line at when your bad havit affects someone else

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 5 points 11 months ago

Where I live (the US), smoking in most public places is already banned unless you're outdoors and far from the entrance to act building. Any additional ban would apply almost exclusively to people who smoke alone or in the presence of other smokers.

[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

That's not been the argument where I live for a generation ban, because smoking in public is already banned - so the argument is all about the health of the people who can no longer buy cigarettes.