this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
62 points (95.6% liked)

Games

16742 readers
790 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
62
New Naruto fighting game receives backlash for questionable redub, raising eyebrows over potential AI voiceover: "I can guarantee I did not say that line that way" (www.gamesradar.com)
submitted 11 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yokonzo@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They generated the voice actors voices without their consent? That's fucked, they paid for the lines, not their likenesses

[–] Piafraus@lemmy.world -5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

They payed for the voiced lines, they received the voiced lines. They can use them however they want, including changing, mixing and doing whatever else with them.

[–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 26 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If they trained an AI with them it sounds like it's a union issue. Might be an interesting situation to see go to court though.

[–] Piafraus@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

Yeah, I think going forward, the contracts would be rewritten to take this into account. But if old contracts did not cover it, it's probably a lost cause to be angry about it

[–] yokonzo@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

That’s not what happened though, they didn’t take the lines, cut them up in audacity and move them around, they took all the voice samples, put it through an ai generator and generated that actors voice pulling lines in their voice that they never recorded. Not only is this in really poor taste, essentially stealing an actors voice during a really temultious time in AI development, they never asked for consent, or even told anyone that their voice would be fed into an ai model so that they could essentially get free voice overs forever without paying the actors again