this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
36 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7188 readers
562 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Erk@cdda.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Search and rescue does not normally include anywhere near the extent of services given to looking for a lost private submarine.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What, then, is the appropriate amount of resources to spend on five people lost at sea in a fairly well-defined area?

[–] Erk@cdda.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Why are you asking me? I don't know anything about the field. However, a quick search shows this was one of the most expensive S&Rs of all time, comparable to efforts in rescuing 33 stranded miners in chile, who were victims of an accident rather than their own decisions. My point is only that saying "search and rescue is important" doesn't really work as well when we're talking about people who consciously got themselves into an incredibly dangerous and unrescuable situation. I'd fully support sending out normal coast guard searches as we would for a lost boat, for example.

Put differently, if five people took a sailboat out into rough waters and lost contact, would several countries spend tens of millions of dollars looking for the wreckage? If not, then why would we do it for this case?

This is entirely notwithstanding that there's immediate comparable evidence that the S&R was because the passengers were rich, since the coinciding disaster with the refugee boat near greece didn't merit even a fraction of that amount of resource expenditure, so it's pretty hollow to act like this was the normal response.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My point is only that saying “search and rescue is important” doesn’t really work as well when we’re talking about people who consciously got themselves into an incredibly dangerous and unrescuable situation.

When it comes to search and rescue of human beings, the circumstances don't matter. It's a last resort situation - a literal safety net.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except apparently the circumstances did matter

They absolutely didn't - a resue was attempted.

[–] Erk@cdda.social 0 points 1 year ago

All the other things I just said do matter.