this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
567 points (96.1% liked)

Technology

34788 readers
363 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Z3k3@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago (5 children)

I could have sworn I saw something saying Google caved on this due to pressure.

[–] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 42 points 11 months ago (4 children)

They pushed it back. They've done so several times with Manifest V3.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 25 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That's an important distinction. Whenever trillion dollar tech companies say they're not going to do something hugely unpopular and selfish because of public sentiment, what they really mean is they're not going to do it right then. Instead they back off, do something like this to get everyone's attention focused elsewhere, and then they'll push the original unpopular idea anyways, but quietly.

[–] TornadoRex@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Thankfully Google is really good at killing things.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -3 points 11 months ago

I've never really understood the obsession with this. Yes, it's true, but 1) they've never killed anything I actually cared about 2) they can't support infinite software forever. 3) this discussion has nothing to do with anything here. They aren't going to "kill" ads, it's literally the one thing about their company that will never not be the focus.

[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

They don't allow any new MV2 extensions in the store, though.

[–] Tibert@jlai.lu 18 points 11 months ago

It was something else. Web drm : Web Integrity API.

Tho I don't think they canceled the mobile variant of it for apps.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 8 points 11 months ago

They backed off their web drm, because it was hugely unpopular, but also because they remembered they own chromium and can just disable adblockers directly. They tried to over-engineer something that requires everyone else to adopt a new standard, when all they ever needed to do was use a sledgehammer.

[–] neo@lemmy.comfysnug.space 6 points 11 months ago

They played possum while stuffing MV3 with as many internet killers as they could get away with

[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 11 months ago

They did update the Declarative Net Request API to be more useful apparently.

https://www.theverge.com/2023/11/16/23964509/google-manifest-v3-rollout-ad-blockers