this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
41 points (88.7% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5372 readers
829 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7
41
Taylor Swift postpones Rio concert after fan dies amid heatwave (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 1 year ago by anzich@feddit.de to c/climate
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zoe@jlai.lu 18 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Taylor Swift is not climate friendly, so are a lot of pop singers: very energy intensive ..

[–] CadeJohnson 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have heard this, and I can imagine it is true, but have you seen any analysis? There must be a large crew traveling and lots of equipment - transportation is a big user of petroleum in general -- for entertainment. Though they say the entertainment is good.

[–] zoe@jlai.lu 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

exactly. but oil is heavily subsidized and costs money to extract and refine, and mass produced enough to be affordable, making concert tours cost nothing, but it causes a big damage otherwise. how about make half the number of tours ? that would be a good start. or make an onlyfan equivalent, for singers ? sound idea if u ask me

[–] ericjmorey@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

You think online viewing at home will be appreciated by people who want to go to a concert as much as an in person concert?

People entertaining themselves and going to social events is not a moral failing. It's not the thing that needs addressing.

The production company for a touring live entertainment event can find ways to reduce their production of carbon emissions. It would be easier for them to do so if carbon emissions would be priced in line with the costs they create.

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let's just stay inside our homes our whole lives!

[–] zoe@jlai.lu 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

better fund energy transition and you'r welcome touring how much u want, but just dont act like a hypocrite and show false solidarity. but americans are in a whole realm of its own. sometimes i wonder to myself that americans deserve their lot sometime, also while fucking up the rest of the world in the process

load more comments (6 replies)