this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
1973 points (98.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

5801 readers
3341 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I think God for all the illegal streaming sites out there. Because God knows that it's not safe to torrent these days

[–] Rizoid@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not safe? Setting up a VPN isn't that hard.

[–] evranch@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

It's honestly a single click at this point with many of the GUI clients offered by VPN providers, and there's so much competition out there that VPN service is one of the few things in the world actually getting cheaper.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Yes but the free ones throttle you

[–] MartinXYZ@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because God knows that it's not safe to torrent these days

It's safer to use illegal streaming? What's so unsafe about torrenting?

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Uploading is infringement. Downloading is not. Streaming is downloading. Torrenting is both.

[–] MartinXYZ@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Uploading is infringement. Downloading is not.

Is this the law in the US? I'm not sure that's how it is everywhere...

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 2 points 1 year ago

The way the law is written in the US - and in many other parts of the world - only the uploader has the capacity to infringe. Not everyone realizes it, and rightsholders say that downloaders are also culpable. But, the US law does not specifically declare receiving a copy to be an infringing act.

For a downloader to be infringing, they would have to be culpable for uploading as well as downloading. The downloader would have to conspire with the uploader to commit infringement. Rightsholders have tried to make this argument with public trackers, but they have never succeeded. As far as I know, this argument has never been tried with private trackers. The process and requirements of joining and participating in a private tracker may very well be enough to support a conspiracy charge.

[–] francorbacho@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Direct streaming/downloading doesn't give your IP away (just to the server), torrenting does.

[–] SirPeta@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago
[–] vinhill@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Though some streaming sites are torrents in the background.

[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

This is why you use Usenet.