this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
31 points (80.4% liked)

Canada

7187 readers
438 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The carbon tax isn't a "shakedown" btw, the income is redistributed.

Are you suggesting there is a city in Canada that doesn't have some form of public transit? I'm not aware of any large cities like that so I really struggle to understand why you feel the carbon pricing wouldn't be effective right now.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Having public transit is not the same as having reliable and competitive public transit. The transit has to be reliably competitive in travel time and cost to truly see people shift to using it. If most car commutes in the city are 25 minutes, and the average transit time is 1hr 15 minutes, the transit is not competetive enough to attract riders except those with no other option at all.

Transit can be improved by extending the network, increasing the frequency, improving the speed (like dedicated bus lanes or light rail lines), and competitive pricing.

[–] joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

All of those improvements do and are happening though, but ridership is used to inform the changes.

The denser parts of cities do have transit that accomplishes what you're asking for.

[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately a lot of people don't live in cities at all, let alone the dense parts with the service like you describe. EVs may not be the answer overall, but for many people across the country they're the only viable first step away from ICE vehicles.

Right now with affordability the way it is, it feels like we're getting a lot of stick without much carrot.

[–] joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

A lot of people do love in dense areas in cities though. That's what makes them dense.

And programs like the carbon pricing makes those places more attractive to build denser housing.

EVs don't even need to be the only alternative, if the carbon pricing is encouraging someone to buy a more fuel efficient ICE vehicle, the incentive is still working.

I still have such a hard time understanding how people are calling the carbon pricing setup a stick, most of us are getting more money back from the program. Yes overall oil prices worldwide have gone up since the program started, but international oil prices aren't impacted by Canadian carbon pricing policy...

[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 months ago

Not everything is black and white. I can agree with the idea of a carbon tax while also acknowledging how it can feel less fair to different people in different areas.