this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
175 points (94.0% liked)

World News

38563 readers
2715 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The U.K. paper confirmed it had removed the letter because of its sudden surge in popularity on TikTok and other social media sites.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Discoslugs@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't believe in any form of censorship

You don't believe CSAM should be reported and removed from websites?

Cuz thats censorship as well.

[–] samokosik@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What I meant is censorship in terms of opinions on topics. We should be presented with both sides imo

I should have written it in a clearer manner

[–] 0xD@infosec.pub 2 points 10 months ago

There is no "both sides", there is an infinite amount of opinions and perspectives on one thing: reality. Not all of those opinions are worth engaging with or deserve a platform.

Though in this case with the letter it's historically significant and I find their reasoning kind of pathetic, so I agree with you here.