this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
496 points (89.6% liked)

linuxmemes

21263 readers
572 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    Snaps:

    On server = good

    On PC = bad

    [–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

    Hell no. I can't have my server updating itself without explicit approval, randomly breaking shit at any hour of the day.

    [–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Snap is basically Dockers right?

    I hated it and it made me switch to debian, I don't see the point to install all dependencies for each apps, I guess they don't want to deal with package dependencies anymore, so let's install the same version of python 10 times

    [–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

    It's supposedly containerisation, but not really docker. After all, docker itself merely presents the OS's underlying feature in a somewhat more accessible way (keyword: somewhat).

    Snap is more like a big ecosystem around that idea that breaks everything that should work in that context, is a security nightmare and is sold as "work anywhere" but really only work in one place, which developers could have targeted in the beginning without having to rely on Snap to begin with.

    [–] SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

    I would actually benefit from beig able to keeps different versions of dependencies rn. Got a deprecated software wich forces me to exclude a package from my updates.

    [–] diomnep@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago

    Snaps just don’t really work very well. When I have had problems in the past and gone looking for answers, what I consistently find is that the problem is fixed by installing the non-snap version of . I love containers but if I am going to use them I want to have control over how they are configured and that they have access to.

    Or at least if I don’t control them I just want them to work, and they never do. I would use them if they weren’t consistently shit.