College Football

842 readers

7 users here now

A community to discuss college football.

/c/CFB Poll Top 25
1. Oregon
2. Ohio State
3. Indiana
4. Texas
5. Notre Dame
T-6. Ole Miss
T-6. Tennessee
8. Penn State
9. Alabama
10. BYU
11. Miami
12. SMU
13. Georgia
14. Boise State
15. Army
16. Texas A&M
17. Clemson
18. South Carolina
19. Washington State
20. Colorado
21. Louisville
22. Tulane
23. Kansas State
T-24. Iowa State
T-24. LSU

Check out our other sports communities!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Manibusan@fanaticus.social

orangeNgreen@fanaticus.social

ToasterOverlord@fanaticus.social

orangeNgreen@lemmy.world

g0d0fm15ch13f@lemmy.world

game_bot@fanaticus.social

Big 12 adds 'clarification' to tiebreaker rules (archive.ph)

submitted 1 year ago by anhydrous@lemmy.world to c/cfb@fanaticus.social

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

“If all the tied teams are not common opponents, the tied team that defeated each of the other tied teams earns the Championship berth.”

As George Stoia of On3’s Sooner Scoop pointed out, the original tiebreaker rules did not have that sentence in there. The language has been added to Step 1.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] anhydrous@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

There's a bunch of teams at the top vying for spots in the championship game, and there are possibilities for ties. Some combinations of W-L to close out the season had certain assumed tie-breakers to get to the championship game, but this "clarification" breaks some of the assumptions. The statement by the Big XII acts as if nothing has changed, but it looks like they added qualifying words that weren't there previously in order to make this clarification.