this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
990 points (95.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

19623 readers
28 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Feyter@programming.dev
anzo@programming.dev
BurningTurtle@programming.dev
pylapp@programming.dev
990
GoOn (programming.dev)
submitted 1 year ago by mac@programming.dev to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
103 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Static_Rocket@lemmy.world 175 points 1 year ago (2 children)

0.0.0.0/0 0::0/0

You didn't specify it couldn't be in CIDR block notation...

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Remember, when we abbreviate an ipv6 address all leading zeros are reduced to a single 0.

E.g

0003 would just become 03

When there are geoups of 4 zeros these can be represented as a single 0 or as a double colon ::

But we can only use the :: once so when summarizing an address containing multiple groups of 4 0s one after the other they can all be abbreviated to a single ::

Eg

fe80:0000:0000:0000:0210:5aff:feaa:20a2 would become fe80::210:5aff:feaa:20a2

Therefore it is perfectly valid to abbreviate an address of 0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000 /0 to just ::/0

[–] Static_Rocket@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Eh, I've seen some software internally prefer 0::0 instead of just ::0 or :: . Notation wise though you are correct, it is unnecessary.