this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
91 points (95.0% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2511 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The armed wing of the Palestinian militant group Hamas said on Monday it told Qatari mediators the group was ready to release up to 70 women and children held in Gaza in return for a five-day truce with Israel.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JoeHill@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Headline is wrong. The article makes it clear that it’s in exchange for prisoners in Israeli jails PLUS a truce.

Last week there was an effort from the Qatari brothers to release the enemy captives from women and children, in return for the release of 200 Palestinian children and 75 women detained by the enemy" Abu Ubaida, the spokesman for the armed wing of Hamas, al-Qassam Brigades, said in an audio recording posted on the group's Telegram channel.

"The truce should include a complete ceasefire and allow aid and humanitarian relief everywhere in the Gaza Strip," he said.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

tbf, Israel releasing mammoth numbers of their prisoners for small numbers of their own citizens is pretty standard, and would probably be assumed by anyone well familiar with the history of the conflict.

[–] Astrealix@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Israel's clearly taking this war in a different direction from usual, unfortunately — based on what they're saying at least, it seems the intent is to eradicate Hamas and deal with the consequences later

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think we need to focus in on the guy on top. Average Israelis are pretty normal people, and normal people just want to live.

Netanyahu, however, has a very small number of possible routes that don't end with him personally having his own life destroyed, alongside his current nutjob buddies. Most likely, though, his days are numbered. He's a political dead man, and given how common assassination is, he might be a literal one too. Few years, at best.

According to a recent poll, around 75% of Israelis want him to resign immediately or at the end of the war.

That's really, really bad. He's (rightfully) getting almost all the blame for this fiasco of historical proportions.

I mean, this could potentially spiral into Napoleon-attacking-Russia levels of "oops, I guess I fucked up..."

[–] Astrealix@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Netanyahu is fucked, probably... but it is worth noting that he has gotten out of shit like this before. And a lot of Israel supports this war, while also hating Netanyahu — hence "end of the war".

https://time.com/6333781/israel-hamas-poll-palestine/ According to this article from earlier last week, "57.5% of Israeli Jews said that they believed the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) were using too little firepower in Gaza, 36.6% said the IDF was using an appropriate amount of firepower".

In my opinion, that's something that is even more significant than the fact that as long as the war continues, Netanyahu will be in power unless he gets assassinated (which, given the region's history, is certainly possible to be fair, but usually comes from the right). Sure, replace him. Gantz will still pursue this war, Ben Gvir would probably nuke Gaza if he could help it, and a lot of MKs would still want something like this. Hell, even Lapid says there can't be Hamas in Gaza after this. Every politician (except probably from Labour / Israeli Arab parties) will support this war, because the people demand it.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Calling for the complete destruction of your enemy after suffering a surprise military attack is pretty common, I would have expected no other possible reaction, from any administration anywhere in the world. Except maybe the Dalai Llama or something.

The key is it doesn't last. It's biological in nature, and that neurological damage suffered as a result of the intense trauma slowly heals on its own. Rationality re-asserts itself, and you start looking for actually pragmatic solutions again, instead of emotional reactions.

As we can all see with our better objectivity from so far away, their current course of action is not an actually practical, pragmatic solution. Instead it is likely to make things worse. They will, one-by-one, slowly heal enough until this realization begins to become apparent.

Where they are currently unable to see it. In many cases, anyway.

edit: We have a term for the feeling, incidentally. It's called cold fury. I think we've probably all seen it for ourselves, or maybe even felt it before. Don't fall for the "I'm perfectly calm" line though. It's a lie, and they're just lying to themselves first.

[–] JoeHill@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

“Anyone well familiar with the history of the conflict” doesn’t describe the vast majority of opinions I’ve found on the internet so I felt it was important to clarify since the headline is misleading at best.

Secondly, I think the calculus has changed. Netanyahu used to have no problem propping up Hamas. So, sure, trade Yahya Sinwar and a thousand other prisoners for Gilad Shalit. In Netanyahu’s mind, that will only help destabilize the PA and allow him to keep building settlements in the West Bank. That strategy came home to roost on October 7.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Thank you for the further clarification. I'll need to learn more about the current situation. I was aware of the cash he was giving to HAMAS, but I do not know enough about the interior affairs of domestic Palestinian politics to understand the deeper ramifications of these moves.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you the JoeHill from back on /r/law?

[–] JoeHill@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

No worries, have a good day.

[–] interceder270@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It makes sense if you look at the death toll.

Israeli lives are just worth more than Palestinian's.

[–] Kolrami@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If the mods were consistent they would have removed OP's post as per Rule 3.