this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
13 points (93.3% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7186 readers
815 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
pangyuehung@lemmy.ml
yogthos@lemmy.ml
13
Biden announces more free money for telcos (www.pbs.org)
submitted 1 year ago by krolden@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I personally think expanding access to high-speed Internet is a good thing, especially if you can lower the barrier to access for individuals who may not be able to afford an Internet plan.

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Except theyre not and it won't. They've been giving telcos billions over the last 30 years for that and all they've done is lobby against regulation and raise peoples internet bill. Mine has gone up $20 over the last two years and ive heard nothing about putting price caps on isps.

[–] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

I'm not certain how to prove or disprove your statement, so for now I'll assume it's true. But, from the article, it seems like this money is going to the states, themselves:

The amount each state, territory and Washington, D.C., will receive from the $42.5 billion program depends primarily on the number of unserved locations in each jurisdiction or those locations that lack access to internet speeds of at least 25 megabits per second download and 3 Mbps upload.

and

States will have until the end of the year to submit initial proposals outlining how they plan to use the money, which won’t begin to be distributed until those plans are approved

and

Under the rules of the program, states must prioritize connecting predominantly unserved areas before bolstering service in underserved areas, or those without access to internet speeds of 100 Mbps/20 Mbps, and community anchor institutions, such as schools and libraries.

So I think it is a little more nuanced than just giving telcos free money.