this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
674 points (94.6% liked)

linuxmemes

21197 readers
193 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     

    I use plasma, BTW

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] zephr_c@lemm.ee 44 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Use systemd if you want. It's not perfect, but nothing is. There are certainly good reasons to use systemd, including, but not limited to, that it's the default on most distros and you don't want to mess with init systems. My only complaint is that too much software and documentation is written with the expectation that you have systemd for no good reason, which makes it harder to leave, which makes more people stick with it, which is an excuse to neglect support for other init systems even more.

    [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 39 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    for no good reason

    I think the reason is that almost everyone uses systemd

    [–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)
    [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

    I'm not sure if this counts as reasoning, more like they just feed each other, with all starting from the original lack of documentation

    [–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    That just sounds like a reason to not bother supporting Linux, when Windows is so much more popular

    [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

    Yes that's what lots of companies/people do

    [–] zephr_c@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

    Yeah. That was my point. It's a self fulfilling cycle of people using it because it's all that's supported, and it being all that's supported because people use it. I think that is a problem. That's the same reason most software is for Windows. I don't think that's a good reason.

    [–] ale@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    My question was just curiosity. If there's a good reason to switch to something else, I'd like to know, you know?

    [–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    You get a lot more transparency with the other init systems. Systemd is a big system that does lots of things and it's not always possible to see everything it's doing, because it's doing a lot.

    [–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    It also likes to hide things behind port redirections and binary storage of things that have always been text before so you pretty much have to use their tools to even read them

    [–] dan@upvote.au 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    I assume there's an advantage to the binary formats though. More efficient in terms of storage size? Easier to quickly search by a particular field even in huge files? Maybe something like that. (I genuinely don't know)

    [–] zephr_c@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

    I can actually understand what's going on with other init systems. They're basically just a list of stuff that gets run before you even log in. I do not understand everything that systemd does. I like understanding what my computer is doing. Most people don't care about that, and there's nothing wrong with that, but systemd is not what I want. I feel forced into using it anyway though, because it can be a lot of work to avoid it, and there's no reason for that beyond the fact that not enough people care.

    I get it. I'm in a small niche within a small niche. Nobody owes me an easy alternative to systemd. I'd still like one though.

    [–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

    Exactly. Other systems are clearly doing one thing: init. Systemd wants to do everything

    [–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

    Agreed. Was just looking at Podman's documentation the other day, and even though it'll run on distributions without systemd, for a second I thought cgroups might not even work without systemd. Glad that's not the case though, but I'm predicting a few problems down the road simply because I plan to use Alpine.