this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
235 points (78.0% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2470 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"As the president of the United States, you have power to change the course of history, and the responsibility to save lives right now," the staffers wrote.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

This was reported for having a misleading headline, however the headline on the post is the exact same as the headline on the article.

I agree, the headline makes it sound like Biden was addressing the "500+ former staffers" when he was not, that's an issue to take up with commondreams.org.

If OP had editorialized the headline in a misleading fashion, I'd remove it. In this case they are accurately passing along the headline from the article.

[–] Sneptaur@pawb.social 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Consider the quality of sources allowed to be posted to the community. Some sites are bad, and it’s okay to filter them out in the interest of quality.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We have talked about that, and commondreams.org has a high credibility rating and is allowed to be posted here:

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/common-dreams/

[–] Sneptaur@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago

That’s helpful, thank you. I take issue with their headlines is all.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That doesn't mean you can't remove the post because the article headline is misleading, it's just that the blame lies on the site rather than OP.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Our policy is that the headline must match that of the article, so any problem with the headline should be directed at the people writing it.

Leaving the post drives the discussion of how and why the headline is misleading, which is in and of itself a valuable conversation.