Nationalise essential needs and create State corporations, let capitalism have fun with non essentials. If don't care if private producers make wine or funky clothing or big houses, the government should make sure everyone has food to eat, basic clothes to wear and a place to live.

On that last part, buildings with 8 living units or more should be ran by a non profit State corporation, charge people based on the cost of maintenance and the salaries required, send a check if people were charged too much at the end of the year.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You left out, healthcare, education, higher education, and Internet access. While we are covering basic human rights, let's make sure we cover all the basic human rights.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Outside of internet access these things are already nationalised in first world countries (I know exactly what's implied by what I'm saying). I didn't feel the need to enumerate every single thing.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But we need free markets to handle the essentials because free markets consistently provide while governments consistently fail.

We need the systems that work connected to the most critical needs.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

State corporations are private companies whose profit go to the government instead of an owner or investors. The place in North America that has the cheapest electricity is Quebec and that's because it's a State corporation producing it, it still makes billions in profit that is then reinvested by the government.

So no, free markets isn't necessary. Heck, the free market is what makes it so the US government is the one that spends the most per capita for healthcare even if it only covers part of the population.