this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
58 points (93.9% liked)

Selfhosted

40251 readers
1002 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
58
Is this a bad option for a home server? (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by qaz@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
54 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Image transcription:

Processor: (3.40 GHz) 4-Core Intel Core i7-6700 Processor

Memory (RAM): 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 PC4 U Memory (for i-series/Core Processors)

Graphics Card: Integrated Graphics (with i series processors only) +$0.00

Drive 1: 3TB HDD SATA 7.2k 3.5" Hard Drive

Drive 2: 3TB HDD SATA 7.2k 3.5" Hard Drive

M.2 Storage: 512GB M.2 SSD NVMe Drive

Price: $291.95

My main concern with this option is energy usage. The CPU's TDP is 65W, the CPU in my current server's TDP is 35W.

It does have a few advantages over my current setup:

  • More RAM 8 → 32
  • Better CPU, passmark score 4766 → 8091, threads 4 → 8
  • Ability to use RAID, current setup only has the capacity for 1 drive.

Is this a good option or is there a better option? I've also been considering using an external drive enclosure with software RAID, but I heard that could be unreliable.

EDIT: Is the price good? Shipping is quite expensive (about $100), so I'm only planning on buying it if the deal is good.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unless you have specific needs for compute, I'd go with that.

You really ought to look into idle power though. At $0.1/kWh, 1W is about $1/year. You can extrapolate from there.
TDP doesn't matter here but the i3 is likely more efficient under load.

The shipping cost is quite extreme though. Not sure I'd pay that.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I’m gettin some mixed messages between you and teawrecks@sopuli.xyz’s comment.

[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Well, unlike us, they're obviously living in a country which massively subsidises energy cost. But it seems they either haven't done the math properly or their measuring device is broken because even they shouldn't be paying pennies per month.

You can do the calculation for yearly cost yourself; it's not too hard. The two variables you need are energy pice and power.

Let's say you've got 30W idle power draw at 0.4€/kWh. That comes out to ~105€/year if you ran it 24/7.

You can plug in arbitrary values yourself: https://numbat.dev/?q=1+year++30W++%280.4%E2%82%AC%2FkWh%29%E2%8F%8E

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks. I haven’t measured the amount of watts yet (I will soon) but online people mention the i5-6500T using 8W at idle. That would be about €30/y and is indeed a lot higher than a couple pennies.